833
edits
Please sign and share the petition 'Tighten regulation on taking, making and faking explicit images' at Change.org initiated by Helen Mort to the w:Law Commission (England and Wales) to properly update UK laws against synthetic filth. Only name and email required to support, no nationality requirement. See Current and possible laws and their application @ #SSF! wiki for more info on the struggle for laws to protect humans.
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (deniability -> what should be deemed deniable) |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (rm duplication of content + improve wordings + bolding) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Digital look-alikes]] and [[digital sound-alikes]] prompt some changes to [[w:Rules of evidence|w:rules of evidence]] and updates to what should be deemed deniable. | [[Digital look-alikes]] and [[digital sound-alikes]] prompt some changes to [[w:Rules of evidence|w:rules of evidence]] and updates to what should be deemed deniable. | ||
Recordings that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''" | '''Recordings''' that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''" | ||
'''Pictures''' and '''videos''' that looks like someone doing something '''[[digital look-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I am not in that image/video.''" | |||
If '''[[Glossary#Media forensics|media forensics]]''' proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered evidence. | |||