Advice for judiciaries: Difference between revisions
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) + starting on intro: Digital look-alikes and digital sound-alikes prompt some changes to w:rules of evidence and updates to deniability. |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) m lang fix |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Deniability of audio recordings by living people = | = Deniability of audio recordings by living people = | ||
Recordings | Recordings that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''" | ||
== Proving denied audio recordings == | == Proving denied audio recordings == | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 6 April 2019
Digital look-alikes and digital sound-alikes prompt some changes to w:rules of evidence and updates to deniability.
Deniability of audio recordings by living people
Recordings that sound like someone saying something may not be genuine and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "I did never say that thing you got on tape."
Proving denied audio recordings
If media forensics proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered proof of person X having actually said that to a microphone.
Deniability of still pictures and video by living people
Pictures and videos that looks like someone doing something may not be genuine and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "I am not in that image/video."
Proving denied images and videos
If media forensics proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered proof of person X having actually had gotten imaged to the media.