Advice for judiciaries: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:18, 16 April 2019

Digital look-alikes and digital sound-alikes prompt some changes to w:rules of evidence and updates to what should be deemed deniable.

Recordings that sound like someone saying something may not be genuine and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "I did never say that thing you got on tape."

Pictures and videos that looks like someone doing something may not be genuine and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "I am not in that image/video."

If media forensics proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered evidence.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Digital look-alikes]] and [[digital sound-alikes]] prompt some changes to [[w:Rules of evidence|w:rules of evidence]] and updates to what should be deemed deniable.
-Recordings that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''"
+'''Recordings''' that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''"
-If '''[[Glossary#Media forensics|media forensics]]''' proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered proof of person X having actually said that to a microphone.
+'''Pictures''' and '''videos''' that looks like someone doing something '''[[digital look-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I am not in that image/video.''"
-Pictures and videos that looks like someone doing something '''[[digital look-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I am not in that image/video.''"
+If '''[[Glossary#Media forensics|media forensics]]''' proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered evidence.
-If media forensics proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered proof of person X having actually had gotten imaged to the media.