Jump to content

Please sign and share the petition 'Tighten regulation on taking, making and faking explicit images' at Change.org initiated by Helen Mort to the w:Law Commission (England and Wales) to properly update UK laws against synthetic filth. Only name and email required to support, no nationality requirement. See Current and possible laws and their application @ #SSF! wiki for more info on the struggle for laws to protect humans.

Ban Covert Modeling! wiki has moved to Stop Synthetic Filth! wiki

Digital sound-alikes: Difference between revisions

+ examples of voice thieving software: w:Adobe Inc.'s Voco unreleased prototype publicly demonstrated in 2016 + w:DeepMind's w:WaveNet that was acquired by w:Google in 2014
(On digital sound-alikes)
 
(+ examples of voice thieving software: w:Adobe Inc.'s Voco unreleased prototype publicly demonstrated in 2016 + w:DeepMind's w:WaveNet that was acquired by w:Google in 2014)
Line 14: Line 14:


Thus it is high time to act and to '''[[Law proposals to ban covert modeling|criminalize the covert modeling of human appearance and voice]]!'''
Thus it is high time to act and to '''[[Law proposals to ban covert modeling|criminalize the covert modeling of human appearance and voice]]!'''
----
== Examples of software capable to make a digital sound-alike ==
* [[w:Adobe Inc.]]'s [[w:Adobe Voco|Voco]] unreleased prototype publicly demonstrated in 2016
* [[w:DeepMind]]'s [[w:WaveNet]] that was acquired by [[w:Google]] in 2014


Neither of these software are available to the masses at large according to the "official truth", but as is known software has a high tendency to get pirated very quickly.
----
----
Footnote 1. Whether a suspect can defend against faked synthetic speech that sounds like him/her depends on how up-to-date the judiciary is. If no information and instructions about digital sound-alikes have been given to the judiciary, they likely will not believe the defense of denying that the recording is of the suspect's voice.
Footnote 1. Whether a suspect can defend against faked synthetic speech that sounds like him/her depends on how up-to-date the judiciary is. If no information and instructions about digital sound-alikes have been given to the judiciary, they likely will not believe the defense of denying that the recording is of the suspect's voice.
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.